For Reviewers

Guidelines for peer reviewers at JBAEM, covering confidentiality, review timelines, and evaluation criteria.

As a reviewer for JBAEM, you are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity. Key responsibilities include:

Confidentiality

All manuscripts and review materials must be treated as confidential. Do not share or discuss manuscripts with others without explicit permission from the editor.

Conflicts of Interest

Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could bias your review. Decline to review if you have a significant conflict.

No Personal Advantage

Do not use information from unpublished manuscripts for your own research or personal advantage.

Timely Response

Complete reviews within the requested timeframe. If you cannot meet the deadline, notify the editor promptly.

For comprehensive reviewer guidelines and ethical standards, please see our Reviewer Policies.

1. Originality and Novelty

2. Manuscript Organization

The manuscript is structured according to the manuscript type

3. Research Design and Methodology

4. Results, Figures, and Tables

5. Scientific Validity

Results are interpreted accurately and logically

6. References and Citations

References are adequate, current, and relevant

7. Ethical Considerations

8. Recommendation for Publication

Manage your manuscript assignments and submit reviews through our reviewer portal.

Applicants must have a postgraduate degree in the relevant field and have at least three original research papers in journals indexed by Index Medicus, EMBASE, or DOAJ. Please note that the acceptance of applications are at the sole discretion of the editorial team.